The Sinking City 2

ASCENSIONREVIEW

Drez

9/15/2026

Arkham Learned How to Speak

The Sinking City 2 became a better horror game by misplacing half the evidence that made me care about The Sinking City. The old casebook has been traded for locked hallways, meaner puzzles, tight resources, and the understanding that a city can feel larger when it gives you fewer ways to escape it. The sequel ends sooner than its predecessor and gives me far fewer reasons to stop playing. Arkham cuts through that ceremony. Its path is far more linear, although it still leaves rooms to search, routes to reopen, and corners that reward suspicion. The change cost the series a piece of its strange identity. It also gave the sequel a pace the first game rarely possessed. I kept expecting to miss the freedom more than I did. Instead, I found myself relieved that Frogwares had chosen a smaller hunting ground and learned exactly where to turn off the lights.

Calvin helps immediately. Charles Reed carried the first game with the weary posture of a man who had already read his own obituary and found a typo in it. Calvin is livelier, warmer, and considerably more charismatic. He reacts like a person who still expects the world to answer him. That shift prevents the sequel from feeling like Reed wearing a new face and a cleaner jacket. Frogwares gave this story a different nervous system. The voice acting and writing support him. Conversations have energy even though dialogue trees are gone, and the performances sell the human stakes without trying to outgrow the diseased city around them. Corentin and Lorelei preserve the series' appetite for people who seem to have wandered in from a family photograph that should have stayed facedown. Ma Fishface, whose name offers an admirably complete warning label, keeps the door cracked for the possibility that Arkham and Oakmont share more than damp architecture. I still miss choosing how to push an interrogation or assemble a case through conversation. The original game trusted me to search records, connect mental evidence, and occasionally spend ten minutes staring at a map because two street names had begun a private argument. In my earlier review of The Sinking City, I admired how solving a case felt pulled from chaos through stubborn work. Here, advanced puzzles carry more of that intellectual weight. Brainy difficulty asks for attention, and several solutions made me stop, read the room, and distrust the obvious answer. The detective survived. He has fewer lines and a much stricter landlord. Environmental storytelling covers some of the missing dialogue. Arkham's rooms look occupied by consequences. Notes, objects, bodies, and interrupted routines create little investigations with no witness waiting to explain them. Frogwares also slips in references to H. P. Lovecraft as an author, small acknowledgments that feel like the developers know exactly which battered book led many of us here. Late in the journey, one location called At the Mountains of Madness to mind through its scale and buried wrongness. The connection arrived as recognition, not a flashing trivia prompt. One room lands outside the usual fiction. A prosthetic display incorporates real wartime experiences from members of the Ukrainian development team. The room needs no outside argument from me. It does enough by itself. Among monsters, rituals, and impossible anatomy, it offers a grim reminder that playing a horror game is a luxury and making one can happen beside actual horror. I slowed down. The city had spent hours asking me to inspect its dead, and suddenly the evidence belonged to living people.

89

File: Q4R-26-00016-A89-ENL

The Shorter Route to Hell

The sequel's clearest decision is mechanical. Survival horror has moved from side dish to the plate. In the first game, combat mainly kept the detective work nervous. The guns felt weak, the creatures appeared when least invited, and I endured fights because a case waited beyond them. The Sinking City 2 wants the fight, the room before it, and the relieved inventory check afterward to form the case. The Nightshade is a welcome addition because it changes how danger can be approached without turning Calvin into an action hero. Resources remain worth counting. Routes invite return visits. Locked access and new abilities give the spaces a practical memory. The Eldritch Feats system even brings a Resident Evil-style unlock loop after completion, a smart reward for anyone inclined to return with a sharper set of tools and unfinished appetites. The puzzles are better. They ask for observation and inference, and the stronger examples make the room itself feel like a machine I have to understand. That matters in a game which removed so many explicit investigative systems. Every good puzzle reassures me that Frogwares did not abandon thought for ammunition. It moved thought into architecture. Combat produces real panic, though it occasionally confuses pressure with overcrowding. Some spaces cram in enough enemies that bodies, camera, and geometry begin negotiating against me at the same time. Cheap hits arrive from creatures occupying the edge of the frame or squeezing through the same miserable patch of floor. I understand the intended chaos. Survival horror should make a clean plan feel fragile. A few encounters stack the room so heavily that my plan never receives the courtesy of failing. It gets mugged near the entrance. Those moments irritate without poisoning the larger rhythm. The hospital is a terrific stretch, large enough to feel like an ordeal and controlled enough to keep its dread from leaking away. Progress feels direct, yet the rooms still encourage the bad habit horror games have trained into me: open every cabinet, revisit every locked door, and regard an unexpected supply box as a written threat. Near the end, the game becomes extremely generous with ammunition and healing. Frogwares might as well have placed a fruit basket beside the pile with a card reading, "For whatever remains of your evening." Subtle foreshadowing has left the building.

A Room Worth Remembering

The improvement in presentation is immediate. Arkham has weight, depth, and a wet sheen that the first game's stiff streets could only suggest. Interiors are packed with rot that looks accumulated rather than sprayed on five minutes before inspection. Hospital corridors hold the eye through scale and clutter. Creature surfaces have enough detail to make proximity feel like a clerical error. The Slither is especially hard to separate from the 2006 film Slither. The resemblance is so direct that I expected Nathan Fillion to arrive with a shotgun and the expression of a man whose insurance had stopped returning calls. The comparison belongs because the creature itself looks swollen, mobile, and profoundly against local health code. Facial animation and lip syncing still lag behind the rest of the image. Mouths occasionally seem to be following dialogue from the apartment next door. The improvement from the first game is real, and stronger performances carry scenes through the mismatch. Calvin's energy survives the odd animation. The supporting cast sounds present rather than assembled from usable takes. Then there are the safe rooms. Every lasting survival-horror series eventually creates a tiny piece of real estate that players can recognize by pulse rate alone. Resident Evil has its typewriter ritual. Silent Hill can make a save point feel like a wound in the wall. The Sinking City 2 takes its own shot at that kind of iconography. Its safe rooms establish relief through repetition, color, arrangement, and the simple pleasure of a door that means the thing behind me can remain somebody else's administrative problem for a minute. They are trying very hard to become iconic. I mean that with affection and a small amount of suspicion. A safe room cannot submit its own nomination. Players have to carry it out of the game. These rooms have a chance because the sensation arrives before the branding does. I learned to loosen my grip when I entered one. By the final stretch, the room had become a promise I trusted, which is dangerous behavior in Arkham.

Drez

The City That Gave Up Its Map

Frogwares has clearly studied Resident Evil and Silent Hill. The linear progression, deliberate backtracking, resource pressure, unlock system, puzzle density, and sanctuary ritual all come from cabinets other studios built. The influence is heavy enough to leave fingerprints. I loved much of it because the sequel understands why those pieces work. Safe rooms regulate stress. Backtracking turns space into knowledge. A shorter route can produce stronger dread because the designer knows when I will arrive and what I am likely carrying. The risk is that The Sinking City once occupied a stranger corner. Its open investigations, city records, dialogue choices, walking, and boating formed a messy detective game that few studios would attempt. Removing those systems creates a cleaner survival-horror experience while placing the sequel in a far more crowded room. I can name its influences faster than I can name a true equivalent for the first game. Its Lovecraftian universe keeps it from disappearing into that crowd. Arkham is full of recognizable genre grammar, yet Frogwares speaks it with fish people, literary fossils, soaked brickwork, and a genuine interest in cosmic horror as a world rather than a box of tentacles. The final region's resemblance to At the Mountains of Madness gives the journey a sense of ancient scale without requiring a lecture. The dark ending follows that same instinct. It refuses to reward survival with emotional cleanliness. This sequel subverted my expectations by being less loyal to its predecessor than I was. I arrived ready to defend investigation and ended up grateful for editing. Frogwares did not make the same game with better lighting. It used the criticism of all that walking and boating as permission to rebuild the series around fear. Some of the old personality was lost in demolition. The new house is still unmistakably haunted by the same universe.

Frogwares Raids the Right Cabinets

Anyone attached primarily to the first game's open cases and dialogue control will feel the missing pieces. I felt them. Players drawn to Resident Evil's resource rituals, Silent Hill's diseased spaces, and puzzles that expect attention will recognize the new shape immediately. The Sinking City 2 meets that audience with confidence, strong performances, better scenery, and a campaign that ends before its atmosphere can become a commute. Shorter and more linear can sound like retreat when games have trained us to measure ambition in acreage. Here, restraint creates momentum. I had fewer streets to choose from and far more reason to worry about the next door. Calvin gives the trip a voice I wanted to follow. The world retains its peculiar smell. Even the rough combat cannot erase the pleasure of watching Frogwares discover that refinement sometimes requires a knife. I miss the casebook version of this series. I also had more fun after it was taken from me. That contradiction followed me through the ending, past the surplus ammunition and into the last dark image. Somewhere behind it sat another safe room, tidy and dependable, waiting for a door that was no longer going to open.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Follow